Otros libros que te pueden interesar

• 

  Anxiety In Relationships: How to...

  Sebastian Clark

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

  If you feel like anxiety is ruining your relationships and holding you back from happiness, then this is the audiobook for you! 
  Anxiety in relationships can manifest itself in many ways, including social anxiety, panic attacks, depression, negative thinking, jealousy, and attachment issues. 
  If these issues are left untreated, anxiety in relationships can lead to separation or divorce. 
  Welcome to your roadmap to a better relationship! 
  Get a step-by-step guide on how to overcome couple conflicts and improve communication. 
  It covers the key topics of anxiety in relationships, such as identifying triggers and managing emotions, developing effective communication skills and problem-solving techniques, understanding body language, and signals, navigating difficult conversations, and setting boundaries. 
  Discover:What to do next: You’ll get step-by-step advice on what actions you're supposed to take after every interaction.How to manage attachment issues: Overcome your insecurity and put a stop to it being a driving factor for your relationship's failures.Healthy ways to stop negative thoughts: Stop putting the blame on yourself or your partner. It’s time to welcome brighter thoughts that will positively impact your relationshipAdvice all wrapped up in a convenient format: Whether you’re on the go or just enjoying a chill afternoon, this audiobook is the perfect solution to multitasking. 
  This audiobook will teach you how to identify and overcome the causes of your anxiety in relationships. It provides clear steps and solutions that have helped thousands of people achieve happier, more satisfying lives.Scroll up, get the audiobook, and start listening!

  Ver libro

• 

  Personal Attacks and Deflections...

  William Rands

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

  This book contains the following two titles: 
  - The Ad Hominem Fallacy: Logical integrity forms the bedrock of meaningful communication and rational discourse. It represents the commitment to sound reasoning, free from fallacies and emotional manipulations, and ensures that arguments are evaluated based on their merits rather than irrelevant distractions. In a world increasingly influenced by misinformation, polarized debates, and the rise of social media as a dominant platform for discussion, maintaining logical integrity is not merely an intellectual exercise but a societal necessity. 
    
  - The Tu Quoque Fallacy: The Tu Quoque fallacy, often referred to as the "appeal to hypocrisy," is a form of argumentation where an individual deflects criticism by accusing the accuser of the same flaw or wrongdoing. Instead of addressing the substance of the criticism, the person making this fallacious argument focuses on the accuser’s behavior, thereby shifting the attention away from the original issue. This technique is often employed to avoid dealing with uncomfortable truths and to undermine the credibility of the person making the accusation. While the Tu Quoque fallacy may seem like a valid rebuttal in certain situations, it is inherently flawed because it does not address the merit of the argument but instead aims to discredit the opponent by pointing out their perceived hypocrisy.  
  Get this discounted bundle now!

  Ver libro

• 

  Plantation Politics and Campus...

  Frank A. Tuitt, Dian D. Squire,...

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

  Plantation Politics and Campus Rebellions provides a multidisciplinary exploration of the contemporary university's entanglement with the history of slavery and settler colonialism in the United States. Inspired by more than a hundred student-led protests during the Movement for Black Lives, contributors examine how campus rebellions—and university responses to them—expose the racialized inequities at the core of higher education. 
   
   
   
  Plantation politics are embedded in the everyday workings of universities—in not only the physical structures and spaces of academic institutions, but in its recruitment and attainment strategies, hiring practices, curriculum, and notions of sociality, safety, and community. The book is comprised of three sections that highlight how white supremacy shapes campus communities and classrooms; how current diversity and inclusion initiatives perpetuate inequality; and how students, staff, and faculty practice resistance in the face of institutional and legislative repression. The volume is indispensable for students, faculty, student affairs professionals, and administrators invested in learning more about how power operates within education and imagining emancipatory futures.

  Ver libro

• 

  German Late War Armored Fighting...

  George Bradford

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

  For modelers and WWIl enthusiasts, a collection of scale drawings of German combat vehicles.   For armor modeling and military vehicle enthusiasts, this volume is filled with fine-scale drawings of Germany’s late war armored vehicles including:     • Pz. Kpfw. V Panther Tank  • Pz. Kpfw. VI Tiger I and II  • Pz. Jager Elephant Tank Destroyer  • Sd.Kfz. 234/2 “Puma” Armored Car  • Jagdtiger with Henschel suspension  • And dozens more . . . 

  Ver libro

• 

  The Chicago Canon on Free...

  Tony Banout, Tom Ginsburg

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

  A collection of texts that provide the foundation for the University of Chicago’s longstanding tradition of free expression, principles that are at the center of current debates within higher education and society more broadly. Free inquiry and expression are hotly contested, both on campus and in social and political life. Since its founding in the late nineteenth century, the University of Chicago has been at the forefront of conversations around free speech and academic freedom in higher education. The University’s approach to free expression grew from a sterling reputation as a research university as well as a commitment to American pragmatism and democratic progress, all of which depended on what its first president referred to as the “complete freedom of speech on all subjects.” In 2015, more than 100 years later, then University provost and president J. D. Isaacs and Robert Zimmer echoed this commitment, releasing a statement by a faculty committee led by law professor Geoffrey R. Stone that has come to be known as the Chicago Principles, now adopted or endorsed by one hundred US colleges and universities. These principles are just a part of the long-standing dialogue at the University of Chicago around freedom of expression—its meaning and limits. The Chicago Canon on Free Inquiry and Expression brings together exemplary documents – some published for the first time here – that explain and situate this ongoing conversation with an introductory essay that brings the tradition to light.
  
  At a time of nationwide campus speech debates, engaging with these texts and the questions they raise is essential to sustaining an environment of broad intellectual and ideological diversity. This book offers a blueprint for the future of higher education’s vital work and points to the civic value of free expression. 

  Ver libro

• 

  The False Consensus Effect -...

  William Rands

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

  The False Consensus Effect refers to the cognitive bias where individuals overestimate the extent to which others share their beliefs, values, and opinions. This phenomenon can be seen across a wide range of social, political, and personal contexts, often shaping our perception of how common or widespread our views are. Essentially, people tend to assume that their experiences and perspectives are more universally shared than they truly are. This can lead to significant misunderstandings, skewed decision-making, and a distorted view of the world. 
  The roots of the False Consensus Effect trace back to psychological and social mechanisms. From a psychological standpoint, it arises from our natural tendency to see ourselves as typical and representative of a larger group. We are more likely to surround ourselves with like-minded individuals, reinforcing our views and making them appear more widely held. This is further exacerbated by our desire for validation and the comfort that comes from seeing our beliefs reflected in others. As a result, we are inclined to believe that our preferences or values are the norm, even when they may be quite particular to our own experiences. 
  Historically, social psychologists have studied the False Consensus Effect to understand the role of social influence in shaping human behavior. Researchers such as Lee Ross, who first identified the phenomenon in the 1970s, found that people would often overestimate the extent to which others agreed with their positions, even in matters where little or no evidence supported such a claim. This effect is not limited to extreme or controversial opinions but is also observable in everyday decisions and preferences, such as tastes in food, entertainment, or lifestyle choices.

  Ver libro